Archive for the ‘312. Process’ Category.

Some Thoughts About Practice Generalization

This is an overdue post. 3 things that needs to say first.

First: Almost a year now, I was busy with my work and Quoth blog programs. This includes understanding practice generalization more, developing Connecting Practice and Practitioner Group communication campaigns, and overcoming the difficulties of the undertaking in the process.

Second: I feel a need to give thanks to Bob and the AR List for the great thoughts that help me to reflect and think more about practice generalization.

Third: As plan, this piece describes more about practice generalization to explain further its fundamental ideas.

Moreover, in making an effort to describe practice generalization, the terms below might help you to understand the topic:

1. Generalized practice - I agree with the writing of candee basford dated 20th of July 2007 when she said, “The knowledge that is generalized, in my experience, is a way, the approach, an experiment for ordinary citizens to move about and learn in uncertain situations.”

2. Generalizable - I also agree with the writing of candee basford dated 20th of July 2007 when she said, ‘The “findings”, as they have been referred to in this discussion, seem better suited as stories that can be shared at the local level. I think one could anticipate that these stories (findings, actions, outcomes, insights, experiences) could inspire something but not exactly like the original. In this way they generate something (generationable?). … If by generalisable, we mean transferable, adopted in other settings and moments - then I would say it depends.’

Moreover, a generalizable practice in my understanding is more of knowledge (tacit) that we carry in our minds. Usually it is a solution (ways, means, or approaches) to a problem that we transferred to others by making contact; coding and storing it in certain media; sharing and articulating it with others; and allowing it to flow in increasing of connection and/or implementing of something new.

I believe that the transfer of knowledge is a crucial approach for creating common education.

3. Instances - I like the writing of David Tripp (by way of Bob Dick) dated 6th of August 2007 when he said, “However, as the purpose of action research is improved practice, when- and where-ever improved practice is achieved and others get to know about it, they tend to try it too, and so the practice is generalised as it moves from “it happened once here” to “it happens, here, there and everywhere!” and that’s so much more relevant and important in terms of the method than categorical generalisation of other kinds of research.”

However, I thought of the movements from “it happened once here” to “it happens, here, there and everywhere!” as the instances of practice. Instances are cases, examples, or occurrence of generalizability.

4. Pattern - It presents consistent detail and describes sets of relation among practices.

5. Property - It is an attribute of practices, which reflects the processes; programs, reviews, or workflows; procedures; method, techniques, or know-how-steps; planning, administration, functionalities, or technicalities.

6. Generalizability - I disagree with the writing of Ian Hughes dated 24th of July 2007 when he said, “If I may be allowed another comment on generalizability, the Cynefin framework for knowledge management in complex systems claims that there are four knowledge domains which can be called simple, complicated, complex and chaotic. Broadly speaking, positivist, reductionist science (including generalizable research) can make valuable contributions to knowledge in the simple and complicated domain. These methods are not useful in the complex knowledge domain, where a search for scientific generalizability is largely fruitless (except for the complicated and simple bits that are part of a complex situation). Much participatory and collaborative action research seeks to increase knowledge/understanding and improve practice in complex systems or situations. If Dave Snowden and others who use the Cynefin framework are correct, the role for generalizability in the scientific sense is quite limited in this domain.”

By reason of, generalizability in my understanding is a practice set (common properties) of practices (A, B, C, and/or etc.). See also 8. Decomposition (Practice Generalization Modeling Principles) below as supporting details.

Moreover, generalizability offers the following two (2) forms:

a. Proven practice - Generalizability from experience is a proven practice. Usually a proven practice is supported by evidence as proof of the general claims.
b. Assumed practice - Generalizability from another practices is an assumed practice. Usually an assumed practice is suggestive. That is, it gives a person something to think about, organizes his/her thoughts, and influences him/her to try it. Here our understanding informs our action, or the assumed practice is tested in our action.

Further, generalizability can be generated using a method or tool to identify and understand it.

7. Base Generalizability - It is a type of practice set that can be inherited. Typically, it contains the general attributes of generalized practice.

8. Derived Generalizability - It is a type of practice set that inherits some of its characteristics from the base practice set of generalized practice. It contains the specific properties of base practice set.

9. Practice Generalization - It is a process (spiral in nature) that we carry in our minds with a certain purpose (value premise of certain setting and situation) and generalizability necessary to operate subjectively and objectively to accomplish the end cited in the value premise. Usually the process starts to take shapes when we reflected and thought about a need of producing a sense of results

Furthermore, Practice generalization is not a sense of something applying the generalizability to all because it only serves to tell us that the generalizability is framed in a way that allows it to be used to produce same outcome in similar setting and situation. Using the generalizability in other setting and situation would only lost its value to accomplish its purpose.

To understand more what practice generalization is, consider the fundamental ideas described below.

One of the most common sets of activities in Quoth, Connecting Practice, or Practitioner Group (an application in this context) is practice generalization, wherein a person in a managing environment, whether it be office, school, home, or one’s workplace, wants to generate his practice based on certain setting and situation, let say, as father in a family; define his practice; and specifies all his “father-related” roles and responsibilities on purpose, such as ” head”, “provider”, “husband”, and “etc.” as dictated by or directed to support other practices. That is, he obtains and preserves the wholeness of an existing direction in striving to accomplish specific purpose.

Observe, other fathers in the application hold a different set of descriptive attributes or facets. Yet, they focus on the same purpose and achieve this same father practice on similar setting and situation.

In the event that a father learns about the other father practices interconnected in the application; and wants to remodel and enhance the quality of his father practice from these father practices, he can simply remodel his father practice by originating and capturing the practice set of these father practices using one or more modeling principles below:

1. Examination - A modeling principle that challenges a practice to generate generalizability. Usually an issue is raised when a practice is challenged by questioning:

the value of the practice, that is, the purpose to be accomplished or served;
the means to achieve the purpose;
the different definitions used in the practice; and
so on.

The intent of examination is not to knock the practice down, but to test or see how far the practice would apply.

Moreover, examination helps us to bring the unexpressed practice to light; make practice distinctions; see the structure of a controversy and organize our thoughts better for knowing and decision making; and create emerging data, information, knowledge, and possibilities to understand, support, or reject the practice.

2. Purpose (the value premise of certain setting and situation) - A modeling principle that must realize first by a generator of practice to take steps in working with possible competence to achieve results. Usually it is perceived while the generator of practice is contemplating to a “why” question. The answer to the “why” question is to accomplish the end cited in a value premise.

Moreover, purpose provides direction and helps a generator of practice to put a generalized practice into order when the generalized practice is confronted by pattern of base (unstable); disruptive program and functionality; and rough period (increase complaining) condition that could initiate a weak, divided, distracted, shaky, and/or inadequacy problems. This includes removing the generator of practice to focus on needed direction, development momentum and wholeness, and/or correlation with others.

Purpose is required to serve as a bridge in achieving aspirations.

3. Network - A modeling principle that models generalizability with legitimate responsibility relationships and interdependence.

Moreover, network is an environment that helps a generator of practice to organize line and staff relationships to think in innovative terms and complementing others in achieving results.

4. Alliance - A modeling principle that models generalizability with political stability and reliable security needed against unpleasant conditions.

Moreover, alliance is an environment that helps a generator of practice to build relationship and interdependence with others to achieve results.

5. Inheritance - A modeling principle that inherits the characteristics of practice set of practices to generate generalizability.

6. Polymorphism - A modeling principle that allows generalizability to be used by different people.

Moreover, polymorphism is the ability of different people to respond, each in its own way, to an identical practice.

7. Alignment - A modeling principle that directs generalizability to support a form.

Moreover, alignment helps us to get better understanding of our practices by connecting it with other forms of similar understanding.

8. Decomposition - A modeling principle that allows a generator of practice to break a practice into parts, or forms - each of which represents generalizability.

For example: A practice has started after obtaining the approval to go ahead. The relationships between forms are as follows:

a. Form 1, Form 2, Form 5 can start at once.
b. Form 1 and Form 2 must be completed before Form 3 and Form 4 can start in that order.
c. After Form 5 is completed, Form 6 can start.
d. Form 3, Form 4, and Form 6 must be completed before Form 7 can start.
e. After completing Form 7, Form 8 and Form 13 can start in that order.
f. After Form 8 is completed, Form 9 can start.
g. Before starting Form 10, Form 9 must be completed.
h. After Form 10 is completed, Form 12 and Form 11 can start.
i. After Form 11, Form 12, and Form 13 are completed, Form 14 can start.
j. Must complete Form 14 before starting Form 15.

The above is the form relationship of the practice.

Note that the occurrence (returning the result) of one form may trigger (initiating a request to carry out) the succeeding actions of another form - here it is called event. The event between forms, that is, the events before the accomplishment of the end cited in the purpose of the practice are called extended and/or intermediate events.

The above construct is an ideal solution in solving complicated, complex, and chaotic problems.

9. Modulation - A modeling principle that devides a form into a careful set of generalizabilities interconnected with synthesis in a mainly top-down fashion.

Moreover, modulation provides a systematic and transparent inventory, and a framework for evaluation and refinement of generalizability information.

10. Stepwise development - A modeling principle that constructs more patterns in focusing and strengthening operational direction.

Moreover, the stepwise development helps a generator of practice to initiate cooperation and collaboration with others.

11. Integration - A modeling principle that proceeds in an order governed by pattern interdependencies and wholeness of purpose.

Moreover, integration has a focus departmental and individual purposes that unites, utilizes, and aligns generalizability in the fundamental structure and natural processes of operation; makes clear priorities; and eliminates guessing about next move to achieve results.

12. Abstraction - A modeling principle that draws an analogy between and/or removing certain properties of practices allowing concentration on the properties they do share, so that a generator of practice can see the commonality.

Note that an analogy is stronger when the practices compared have a greater number of significant points in common and weaker when the practices compared have a greater number of significant points of difference. That is, the result separates what’s important from what’s not from the practices and leads a generator of practice to discover the fundamental relations at work and adopt the interested characteristics to affect the purpose.

13. Encapsulation - A modeling principle that compartmentalizes the elements of an abstraction that constitute its properties.

Moreover, encapsulation is the result or act of packaging practices and resources together. It allows certain creation of generalizabilities.

Here a generalizability of father practices will be generated from any of these modeling principles to yield similar outcome in similar setting and situation once carried out properly and with passion.

Also observe, much of a father’s work deals not only with his family, but with group, management, or organization as a whole in reality. Thus, a father can generate more than one practice and define them “Supervisor”, “Manager”, or “etc.”

‘m most interested in what others’ thoughts might be.

Hardware Development

How Can a Practice Training Stage Arise in Our Society?

Quoth presents some formidable obstacles to those who would like to understand what it’s all about or begin trying it out. It introduces a new way of doing things that may seem strange at first, and it comes with an extensive terminology that can take some getting used to. The terminology will help in the end, but it’s not always easy to learn.

The knowledge above is where the practice training stage arises in our society. It’s designed to help a person become familiar with Quoth and get over the hurdle its terminology presents. In addition, it spells out some of the implications of Quoth and tries to give him a flavor of what a practice is really like. That is, it meets the need for practice generalization in feeling, reflecting, thinking, and taking on the best of “what is” and/or “what could be” of practice. Note that practice generalization like most interesting new developments builds on some old ideas, extends them, and puts them together in distinctive ways. The result is many-faceted and a clear step forward.

Moreover, the practice training stage is focused on teaching approaches. It produces ways to help a person in developing, achieving, and improving the necessary areas of his/her practice. In effect, the question “how can this subject matter best be taught?” is raised. the practice, in turn, can be done most effectively and efficiently when a person can have some prior understanding.

Knowledge Management

What Ways Can You Do to Shape Your Practice?

Practice is spiral in nature, which solution to shortcomings would take shape as Quoth proceeds.

The essentials of Practice are characterized as follows:

A. Initially, a person intend to foster deeper understanding of the problem in his/her practice by defining his/her framework (theoretical, conceptual, and operational), process, setting, and situation; and performing analysis to solve potential task and/or activity stopping issue(s). Here the person understands what his/her needs and interest are all about and what his/her practice competency level are and/or require.

B. Then the person develops program and plans the action to reinforce and achieve the purpose. The person develops a strategy as form of intervention.

C. Next the person carries out the strategy to determine how successful the program and action has been. That is, during and around the time of intervention, relevant data are collected for event and/or outcome evaluation. This allows the person to check the effects of the activities s/he intended to do, if s/he is aligned accordingly with the purpose. Note that, the person may use several approach to generate data, such as observing the relevant factors and settings; keeping a note of successes, failures, problems, issues, and/or concerns; interviewing people to discuss information; and analyzing documents.

D. Afterwards the person meets better understanding of the strategy by reflecting and thinking on the result findings of the action.

The person may review:
* his/her frameworks and processes;
* the plan of action s/he was using;
* his/her successes on knowing how well his/her actions were doing;
* his/her failures and the gap between the intended and actual results;
* the problem s/he encountered in his/her action;
* the event and/or outcome that s/he was pursuing;
* the emerging issues and/or concerns collected; and
* the people who are involved in the undertakings.

These will lead the person to:
* evaluate, select, and/or generate alternative solutions to a problem;
* identify causes and commit him/herself to devise ways of few key “sustains” and “improves” for the next cycle of the action;
* Generate worthwhile ideas from the strategy to arrive on something that s/he needs to understand better and make a decision about;
* identify what needs improvement that s/he could do better next time;
* setup within the action some means for on-going monitoring and improvement;
*better understanding on how s/he can achieve his/her purpose; and
*allow him/her to become more effective at achieving his/her purpose.

E. Finally, in keeping up-to-date on the challenges facing the person, s/he records the result findings of the action into a meaningful context, measures his/her action, learns from the experience, and refines the strategy to improve the action until solution to the problem is achieved. The idea is to eliminate and close in upon the problem in his/her practice on which s/he is confronted with the refined strategy. In each “refine” the strategy is tested in his/her practice. The intended changes in the strategy reflect the evolution and redefinition of the strategy throughout the process.

Further, the strategy must be known and clarified by others based on certain condition. This is to ensure that others could help the person collaboratively, agree on the strategy and/or result findings of the action, and develop a coherent view for acceptance, understanding, compelling, empowerment, and/or likely action.

A further, Practice should evolve as you learn more from the process.

Network Development

Can You Cope With The Demands of Your Practice?

While practices are useful tool for helping a person to fulfill a great need in him/her (the need to work), the person can encounter problems while s/he copes with the demands of his/her practice (various goals and/or roles) along with observations that the person lacks motivation to adopt the practice, blindly follows the practice, or worries on how to manage and make his/her practice work. By reason of, s/he knows that it requires purpose, adequate information about how to adapt the practice, and hard work - the pressures of the job - at maintaining an appropriate work/life balance.

I believe The above problems will create NOT better results. Necessarily, the person must learn and understand the practice in part by fluency with it and in part by direct experiences, sound investigative methods, and through his critical discernment and reasoning. Think that person will need to have a better look of all his skills sets to manage his/her practice, self, emotions, and etc. Can s/he cope with the demands of his/her practice?

Think the above question can be answered by a framework (self-assessment and improvement plan) that could empower the person to cope with the demands of his/her practice. By adopting the framework, self-assessment will allow the person to discern clearly his strengths and areas in which improvement can be made.

Moreover, framework adoption is a strategy for developing, achieving, and improving the necessary areas of any effort (practice) with the assumption that the locust of control is in the person.

Talking about self-assessment, it is a comprehensive, systematic, and regular review of a person’s activities. It can help the person to:

* identify practice, develop a case for change, create readiness for action, and track performance;
* codify or write-down transmit tacit knowledge-the know-how; and
* work more effectively by applying it rigorously.

Hardware Development

Are You Having Problem in Learning and Improving Your Practice?

I believe most people have a natural desire to learn, to share what they know, and to make things better. This natural desire is thwarted by disorder (hurdles and deterrents) that we erect in our organization. These includes:

1. A culture that values personal technical expertise and knowledge creation over knowledge sharing. This is rampant in engineering and knowledge-based organizations, such as consulting and research firms.

2. An organization who disintegrates into a group of isolated camps With little incentive or lack of need or responsibility to share knowledge and/or practice with others. They promote “silo” thinking and hoard knowledge and/or practice, in which locations, divisions, and functions focus on maximizing their own accomplishments and rewards. Their question, “why should I share my knowledge and/or practice?”

3. An organization who allows or rewards not the people for taking the time to learn and share and help each other to improve knowledge and skills.

4. A leader who demonstrates the “not-invented-here” syndrome - it is the lack of experience learning from outside one’s on group - or refuses to bring in new ideas committed to an obsolete practice which once made the group successful, but which now threatens to sink it. S/he is unable to innovate or even reinvent the practice.

5. People who lack of contact, relationships, and common perspectives among others who don’t work side-by-side. In most organizations, the left hand not only doesn’t know what the right hand is doing, but it also may not even know there is a right hand.

If you have one or more of this disorder, consider Practitioner Group as alternative to overcome your problem of cultural domination in learning, sharing, and improving your practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and metrics.

Moreover, the owner of Connecting Practice is inviting you to participate in discussing and sharing your free practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics. By joining the Practitioner Group of your needs and/or interests, it will involve and give you an opportunity to embrace the value and reap the potential benefits.

References:

[1] Albrecht, Karl, 17 Basic Syndromes of Dysfunction: The Power of Minds at Work: Organizational Intelligence in Action, 2002, URL: http://www.peace.ca/organizationdysfunction.htm

[2] Identifying and Transferring Internal Best Practices By Carla O’Dell and C. Jackson Grayson, merican Productivity & Quality Center, URL: http://www.bettermanagement.com/library/library.aspx?l=1862

Software Development

What is Connecting Practice Really About?

Connecting Practice is maintained to develop and serve as a practice program resource blog that identifies, promotes, and shares a running log of free practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and metrics for organization and people in creating common education.

Currently, Connecting Practice is progressing in the hope of arriving at a solution to disorder (hurdles and deterrents - a problem of cultural domination in learning, sharing, and improving our practice) characteristically below:

1. A culture that values personal technical expertise and knowledge creation over knowledge sharing. This is rampant in engineering and knowledge-based organizations, such as consulting and research firms.

2. An organization who disintegrates into a group of isolated camps With little incentive or lack of need or responsibility to share knowledge and/or practice with others. They promote “silo” thinking and hoard knowledge and/or practice, in which locations, divisions, and functions focus on maximizing their own accomplishments and rewards. Their question, “why should I share my knowledge and/or practice?”

3. An organization who allows or rewards not the people for taking the time to learn and share and help each other to improve knowledge and skills.

4. A leader who demonstrates the “not-invented-here” syndrome - it is the lack of experience learning from outside one’s on group - or refuses to bring in new ideas committed to an obsolete practice which once made the group successful, but which now threatens to sink it. S/he is unable to innovate or even reinvent the practice.

5. People who lack of contact, relationships, and common perspectives among others who don’t work side-by-side. [It creates interaction patterns with little incentive to cooperate, collaborate, share information, or team up to pursue mission-critical outcomes.] In most organizations, the left hand not only doesn’t know what the right hand is doing, but it also may not even know there is a right hand.

Moreover, the owner of Connecting Practice is building collaborations with target audiences who can help him make the message reach organization and people. This includes inviting them to provide him with their inputs (comments, suggestions, etc). You may click the Work Plan link in the sidebar for more details.

Come and join “Connect With People Supporting Connecting Practice” Facebook Group at: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10104218671

Quality Assurance and Software Testing